🔗 Share this article

As Donald Trump's influence wanes and his public demeanor becomes more erratic, he has intensified vitriolic attacks aimed at female journalists and ethnic communities, with Somali Americans being the latest target. The impact of these insults stems from the animosity behind them and his position, not their factual accuracy. Similarly, the government's actions against immigrants are haphazard and founded on falsehoods. It is abundantly clear that the objective is not targeting those who have committed crimes. The assault is directed at anyone with brown skin.

From Native Americans with official tribal documentation to American citizens by choice, from essential workers in building sites and hospitals to military veterans, university attendees, residents asleep in their beds, and very young children: a wide array of the country's population is under siege.

"ICE operations are brutal, inhumane and do nothing for community security," asserts a leading political figure from New York. The spectacle of officers concealing their faces breaking car glass and dragging parents away from infants, terrorizing entire communities and disrupting schools and businesses, achieves the opposite effect.

The cycles of orchestrated bigotry—focusing on Haitians during the election, Venezuelans this year, and now Somalis—lean heavily on libelous lies and insults. This is because: the actual facts about these communities cannot support the animosity.

The Mythical Nation of White People and Historical Reality

This campaign of terror and demonization purports to aim at recreating a homogeneously white America which is a fiction. Although America had a larger white population in the youth of today's white supremacists, it never constituted a purely white nation. In 1776, the original thirteen colonies contained a substantial percentage of African and Native American individuals—some southern states had Black populations exceeding a third.

When the United States expanded, taking Texas in the 1840s and seizing Mexico's northern territories in 1848, it absorbed a vast community of Hispanic settlers already living across the modern Southwest and California. Historical records show the first African Muslim in territory that became the U.S. came as part of a Spanish exploration party almost one hundred years before the Mayflower English Puritans reached the shores of New England in 1620.

Demographic Realities Against Coercive Fantasies

The persecution of huge populations of brown-skinned individuals and attempts at large-scale expulsion will not manufacture the ethnically pure country of extremist imagination. A city like Los Angeles, for instance, is close to 50% Hispanic, and despite enforcement outrages, arrests, and deportations, its character persists. Its name itself is Spanish, an ongoing testament of its original inhabitants.

All this hatred and oppression looks like the fear of bigots who pretend they can halt the demographic future of a country no longer predominantly white through sheer brutality.

This is paired with an attack on abortion access that is, sometimes, openly intended to encourage white women to bear more babies. The argument points to a below-replacement birthrate in the US, a trend less severe than in other countries due to a hard-working population of immigrant laborers which keeps the economy functioning. However, rather than providing the social support that could ease the burdens of parenthood, the strategy has been based on punishment and force.

A prominent journalist notes that the reproductive politics of certain political figures—coupled with derogatory comments aimed at women without children—amount to pronatalism. This philosophy "typically merges concerns over falling fertility with opposition to immigration and anti-women's rights viewpoints."

In a similar vein, reporting indicates that "attempts to raise the birth rate do not compensate for broader policies aimed at slashing government assistance initiatives like Medicaid and children's health insurance. The so-called 'pro-family' focus is not just for promoting having children. Rather, it is utilized as a tool to advance a conservative agenda that endangers the health of women, reproductive rights, and economic participation."

Incoherent Policies and Widespread Resistance

The combination of anti-immigration and pronatalist policies represent an attempt to artificially redirect the country's population future. In the end, both amount to senseless intimidation by proponents of hate who unintentionally demonstrate that their assertions of being better must be based on skin color and sex; without these constructs, their arguments collapse into meaningless idiocy.

Much of the justification offered by the Trump team fails to align with tangible facts and real-world results. For example, maritime attacks in the southern Caribbean often target small vessels not confirmed to be transporting drugs and not able of reaching US shores. Likewise, Venezuela's role in fentanyl trafficking is minimal, and its role in cocaine trafficking is far less than that of neighboring countries on the continent.

The administration's stance extends to environmental policy, with a dismissal of "climate change ideology" and "Net Zero goals." There is a sentimental commitment to coal and oil, especially coal mining, leading to policies that force communities to invest in obsolete and toxic power sources while sabotaging cheaper, cleaner renewables. At the same time, public health leadership have advanced unscientific nutritional plans while weakening broader health protections.

The foundational assumption of the anti-immigrant offensive is that people of color born abroad are dangerous intruders. However, across the nation—in cities like L.A. and Charlotte, Chicago to Portland—it is the administration's own agents, immigration enforcement personnel, whom local communities view as the dangerous and hostile interlopers.

There is no clearer sign of the widespread rejection of this approach than the countless individuals organizing, protesting, facing danger and detention to protect their communities. Municipality after municipality has stood up in protection of its people. All the insults or intimidation can alter this fundamental truth.